Features of postinfarction remodeling in able-bodied patients

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2022-09-07
Download full text PDF
Issue: 
9
Year: 
2022

Professor G. Babushkina(1), MD; S. Permyakova(2); D. Gareev(1)
1-Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Ufa
2-City Clinical Hospital Thirteen, Ufa

Objective. To evaluate postinfarction remodeling (PR) according to Q myocardial infarction (Q-MI) location within 1 year in able-bodied men during combination therapy including thrombolysis and maximum doses of statins. Subjects and methods. A follow-up was performed in 106 men under 60 years of age with primary Q-MI, who were randomized into 2 groups: 1) 55 patients who took rosuvastatin 40 mg/day as part of drug therapy; 2) 51 patients received atorvastatin 80 mg/day as part of drug therapy. According to age, the patients were divided into subgroups: A) 49 (46.23%) young patients aged 30–44 years; B) 57 (53.77%) patients aged 45 to 60 years. A control group consisted of 30 apparently healthy people without cardiovascular diseases. Results. The patients with Q-MI who took rosuvastatin for 1 year achieved more pronounced reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to those who received atorvastatin. In the subgroup of young patients, the anterior location of MI prevailed in 79.6%; in the subgroup of patients aged 45–60 years, the lower location of MI was in 64.9%. In both subgroups, the patients with anterior Q-MI showed an increase in the left ventricle (LV) end-systolic diameter (ESD) during both early and late PR; in those with lower Q-MI, the increased LV ESD was observed in persons aged 30–44 years during late PR. Conclusion. It is preferable to prescribe rosuvastatin 40 mg/day as part of combination therapy for able-bodied patients with the anterior location of Q-MI, by taking into account the characteristics of PR, as it contributes to a faster achievement of the target level of both LDL and CRP, which is one of the criteria for predicting the severity of Q-MI. One-year administration of the maximum doses of statins has been shown to be safe.

Keywords: 
cardiology
myocardial infarction
postinfarction remodeling
young age
thrombolysis
statins



It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat или click here to download the PDF file.

References: 
  1. Zhukova A.V., Arabidze G.G., Polyakova O.V. Role of combined determination of troponin and copetin in diagnosis and prognosis in acute coronary syndrome with non. Ateroskleroz i dislipidemiya. 2017; 2 (27): 25–37 (in Russ.).
  2. Nasonov E.L., Popkova T.V. Atherosclerosis: perspectives of anti-inflammatory therapy. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2018; 90 (5): 4–12 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/terarkh20189054-12
  3. Diagnostics and correction of lipid metabolism disorders in order to prevent and treat atherosclerosis. Russian recommendations VI revision. Ateroskleroz i dislipidemiya. 2017; 3: 5–22 (in Russ.).
  4. Zhidovich D.M., Shcheglova L.V. Comparative assessment of the indices of the left ventricle post-infarction remodelling of the left ventricle and its dependence on the strategy of acute myocardial infarction management. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2013; 20 (3): 75–8 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/1607-4181-2013-20-3-75-78
  5. Khabibulina M.M. Comparative analysis of specifics of cardiac pain syndrome and silent myocardial ischemia in women with arterial hypertension in pre-menopause depending on daily profile of blood pressure. Kardiologiya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. 2011; 4 (3): 55–60 (in Russ.).
  6. Yao Sun. Myocardial repair/remodeling following infarction: roles of local factors. Cardiovasc Res. 2009; 81: 482–90. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvn333
  7. Dedov D.V., Ivanov A.P., Elgardt I.A. Electro-mechanical heart remodelling and atrial fibrillation development in patients with coronary heart disease and arterial hypertension. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2011; 4: 13–8 (in Russ.).
  8. Albrektsen G., Heuch I., Løchen M.L. et al. Lifelong gender gap in risk of incident myocardial infarction. The Troms Study. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176 (11): 1673–9. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5451
  9. Babushkina G.V., Permyakova S.V., Gubaeva A.M. Predictive markers of severity of postinfarction in patients of working age who have had Q-myocardial infarction. Medical alphabet. 2020; 21: 76–80 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33667/2078-5631-2020-21-76-80
  10. Han X., Zhang Y., Yin L. et al. Statin in the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97 (12): e0167. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010167
  11. Burgos L.M., Battioni L., Costabel J.P. et al. Effect of high-dose statin pretreatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Presented on ESC 2019 (P831), 31 Aug 2019.
  12. Drapkina, O.M. Ivashkin V.T. Improving in arterial stiffness parameters by pulse-wave analysis in obese patients. Atherosclerosis. 2014; 235 (2): e156–e157. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.447