The quality of life in primary school children according to the teaching format and motor activity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2023-09-14
Issue: 
9
Year: 
2023

Professor А. Lebedenko(1), MD; Professor I. Ershova(2), MD; А. Levchin(1), Candidate of Medical Sciences; A. Rogovtsova(2)
1-Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
2-Saint Luke Lugansk State Medical University, Lugansk People’s Republic, Lugansk

Objective. To study the impact of the duration of distance learning on the quality of life (QOL) in primary school children. Subjects and methods. An open cohort prospective study of primary school children and their parents was conducted using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory PedsQL 4.0ТМ. A study group included 182 children (and their parents) who had learned in the distance format for 6 months (Lugansk). A comparison group consisted of 234 primary school children (and their parents) who had had distance learning for 2 months (Rostov-on-Don). Results. The analysis of the results indicated that the first ranking place showing in discomfort and the greatest decrease in the QoL indicators in the study group was displayed by the physical functioning scale (6-month distance learning). The second ranking place belonged to school functioning, the level of which in the study group decreased by 1.27 scores compared to the baseline level. The third ranking place is shown by social functioning of primary school children, the indicators of which in the study group were 18.49 scores lower than the initial levels. Conclusion. Prolonged education of primary school children in a distance format affects all aspects of QOL. The greatest decrease in QOL indicators in younger schoolchildren during the formation of basic learning skills is observed in the field of physical, school and social functioning. The assessment of QOL by primary school children and their parents differs.
Keywords: 
children
life quality
distance learning
motor activity
primary school age

References: 
  1. Калинина О.А., Фоменко Е.А. Дистанционное обучение как компонент системы современного образования. Молодой ученый. Проблемы и перспективы развития образования: материалы XII Междунар. науч. конф. Краснодар: Новация, 2020; с. 1–5 [Kalinina O.A., Fomenko E.A. Distantsionnoe obuchenie kak komponent sistemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Molodoi uchenyi. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya: materialy XII Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Krasnodar: Novatsiya, 2020; рр. 1–5 (in Russ.)].
  2. Gribkova O.V., Shchetinina N.N., Kabkova E.P., et al. The problem of distance learning in modern Russian education (theory and practice). Eurasian Journal of Biosciences. 2020; 14 (2): 4297–303.
  3. Стаселович Г.А. Дистанционное образование в начальной школе: проблемы и возможности. Калининградский вестник образования. 2020; 4 (8): 55–64 [Staselovich G.A. Distance-leading in the primary school: problems and perspective. Kaliningrad regional institute of education development. 2020; 4 (8): 55–64 (in Russ.)].
  4. Nekhorosheva E., Alekseycheva E., Kravchenko A. Quality of life and everyday mobility of schoolchildren: what choice do Moscow parents make? SHS Web Conf. 2021; 98: 02002. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20219802002
  5. Базаева А.А. Андреева Е.Е. Влияние дистанционного обучения на психоэмоциональное состояние учащихся. Вестник психологии и педагогики Алтайского государственного университета. 2020; 4: 8–17 [Bazaeva A.A. Andreeva E.E. Influence of distance learning on students psychoemotional state. Bulletin of Psychology and Pedagogy of Altai State University. 2020; 4: 8–17 (in Russ.)].
  6. Казакова Т.Ю. Психолого-педагогическое сопровождение дистанционного образования учащихся. Начальное образование. 2017; 5 (1): 25–8 [Kazakova T.Y. Psychological and pedagogical support of distance education. Primary education. 2017; 5 (1): 25–8 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.12737/24459
  7. Богданова Д.И. Влияние дистанционного обучения на успеваемость школьников. Молодой ученый. 2021; 3 (345): 38–40 [Bogdanova D.I. Vliyanie distantsionnogo obucheniya na uspevaemost' shkol'nikov. Molodoi uchenyi. 2021; 3 (345): 38–40 (in Russ.)].
  8. Мамедова Л.В., Никифорова В.В. Влияние дистанционного обучения на формирование личностных качеств младших школьников. Современное педагогическое образование. 2020; 10: 100–4 [Mamedova L.V., Nikiforova V.V. Influence of distance learning on the formation of personal qualities of younger school children. Modern pedagogical education. 2020; 10: 100–4 (in Russ.)].
  9. Винярская И.В., Терлецкая Р.Н. Оценка качества жизни детей-инвалидов с помощью инструмента Health Utilities Index: мировой опыт. Педиатрия им. Г.Н. Сперанского. 2020; 99 (4): 224–8 [Vinyarskaya I.V., Terletskaya R.N. Assessing the quality of life of disabled children with Health Utilities Index: world experience. Pediatrics n.a. G.N. Speransky. 2020; 99 (4): 224–8 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.24110/0031-403X-2020-99-4-224-228
  10. Винярская И.В., Терлецкая Р.Н., Черников В.В. и др. Новые подходы к оценке нарушения функционирования у детей-инвалидов с позиции качества жизни. Российский педиатрический журнал. 2019; 22 (3): 176–81 [Vinyarskaya I.V., Terletskaya R.N., Chernikov V.V. et al. Modern approaches to the assessment of the disorder of functioning in disabled children in terms of the quality of life. Russian Pediatric Journal. 2019; 22 (3): 176–81 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18821/1560-9561-2019-22-3-176-181
  11. Баранов А.А., Альбицкий В.Ю., Винярская И.В. Изучение качества жизни в медицине и педиатрии. Вопросы современной педиатрии. 2005; 4 (2): 7–12 [Baranov A.A., Albitsky V.Yu., Vinyarskaya I.V. Stady of the quality of life in medicine and pediatrics. Voprosy sovremennoy pediatrii. 2005; 4 (2): 7–12 (in Russ.)].
  12. Varni J.W., Seid M., Knight T.S. et al. The Pedsql 4.0 Generic core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision – making. J Behav Med. 2010; 25 (2): 175–93. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014836921812
  13. Пеняева С.М. Влияние физических нагрузок на умственную деятельность. Научное обозрение. Педагогические науки. 2019; 2 (1): 12–6 [Penyaeva S.M. The influence of physical activity on mental activity. Scientific Review. Pedagogical sciences. 2019; 2 (1): 12–6 (in Russ.)].
  14. Гордеев К.С., Жидков А.А., Ермолаева Е.Л. и др. Сочетание умственной и физической нагрузки в обучении. Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2021; 12 (128): 31 [Gordeev K.S., Zhidkov A.A., Ermolaeva E.L. i dr. Sochetanie umstvennoi i fizicheskoi nagruzki v obuchenii. Modern scientific researches and innovations. 2021; 12 (128): 31 (in Russ.)]