CLASSIFICATION OF BONE DEFECTS IN PRIMARY KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Download full text PDF
Issue: 
10
Year: 
2017

S. Smetanin, Candidate of Medical Sciences; Professor G. Kavalersky, MD Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Most classifications of femoral and tibial defects during knee arthroplasty were developed for revision operations; however, many orthopedists use them during primary knee arthroplasty.

Keywords: 
traumatology and orthopedics
endoprosthetic replacement
knee joint
classification of defects



It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat или click here to download the PDF file.

References: 
  1. Gavrilov M.A. Total'naja artroplastika kolennogo sustava pri dekompensirovannyh anatomo-funktsional'nyh narushenijah na fone metaepifizarnyh kostnyh defektov. Dis. … kand. med. nauk. Saratov, 2012; 10 s.
  2. Dzhigkaev A.H. Zameschenie defektov medial'nogo myschelka bol'shebertsovoj kosti pri pervichnom endoprotezirovanii kolennogo sustava. Dis. … kand. med. nauk. SPb, 2013; s. 6–14.
  3. Sereda A.P., Gritsjuk A.A., Zelenjak K.B. i dr. Faktory riska infektsionnyh oslozhnenij posle endoprotezirovanija kolennogo sustava // Infektsii v hirurgii. – 2010; 8 (4): 67–76.
  4. Sereda A.P., Kavalerskij G.M., Murylev V.Ju. i dr. Diagnostika periproteznoj infektsii. Ch. 1: Serologija. // Travmatol. i ortoped. Rossii. – 2014; 4 (74): 115–26.
  5. Bargar W. A classification of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Presented at the Knee Society Interim Meeting / Philadelphia, 1992.
  6. Clatworthy M., Gross A. Management of bony defects in revision total knee replacement. The adult knee / Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2003; 1455–63.
  7. De Waal Malefit M., van Kampen A., Slooff T. Bone grafting in cemented knee replacement. 45 primary and secondary cases followed for 2–5 years // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 1995 ;66: 325–8.
  8. De Waal Malefit M., van Kampen A., Slooff T. Bone grafting in cemented knee replacement. 45 primary and secondary cases followed for 2–5 years // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 1995; 66: 325–8.
  9. Dorr L. Bone grafts for bone loss with total knee replacement // Orthop. Clin. North Am. – 1989; 20: 179–87.
  10. Elia E., Lotke P. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with signifiant bone loss // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1991; 271: 114–21.
  11. Engh G., Parks N. The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty // Instr. Course Lect. – 1997; 46: 227–36.
  12. Engh G., Ammeen D. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction // Instr. Course Lect. – 1999; 48: 167–75.
  13. Georgeanu V., Predescu V., Atasiei T. et al. Approach of Tibial Bone Defects in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Advanced Technologies for Enhancing Quality of Life (AT-EQUAL), 2010; p. 69–74.
  14. Hoeffel D., Rubash H. Revision total knee arthroplasty: current rationale and techniques for femoral component revision // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2000; 380: 116–32.
  15. Huff T., Sculco T. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty // J. Arthroplasty. – 2007; 22 (7 Suppl. 3): 32–6.
  16. Insall J. Revision of aseptic failed total knee arthroplasty. Surgery of the knee. 2nd ed. / New York: Churchill, Livingstone, 1993; 935–57.
  17. Lotke P., Carolan G., Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2006; 446: 99–103.
  18. Mulhall K., Ghomrawi H., Engh G. et al. Radiographic prediction of intraoperative bone loss in knee arthroplasty revision // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2006; 446: 51–8.
  19. Qiu Y., Yan C., Chiu K. et al. Review article: bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty // J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). – 2011; 19 (2): 238–43.
  20. Rand J. Bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Use of metal wedge augmentation // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1991; 271: 63–71.