Analysis of the long-term results of tympanoplasty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2020-11-15
Issue:
11
Year:
2020
Objective: to assess and compare the anatomical and functional results of tympanoplasty for
complete and partial detachment of the tympanic membrane from the handle of the malleus. Subjects and
methods. The investigation enrolled 32 patients diagnosed with chronic tubotympanic suppurative otitis media
(mesotympanitis), who were divided into 2 groups, each of which included 16 patients. Results. At 6 and 12
months after surgery, good anatomical results were obtained in 15 (93.8%) and 14 (87.5%) patients in Groups
1 and 2, respectively. Analysis of tone audiometry thresholds showed that the functional indicators
significantly improved compared with preoperative results (p0.05). Conclusion. Analysis of the anatomical
and functional results of the investigation showed no differences between tympanoplasty procedures for
partial and complete detachment of the tympanic membrane from the handle of the malleus.
Keywords:
surgery
otorhinolaryngology
chronic suppurative otitis media
mesotympanitis
tympanoplasty
References:
- Bhutta M. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of otitis media: construction of a phenotype landscape. Audiol Neurootol. 2014; 19 (3): 210–23. DOI: 10.1159/000358549
- Krjukov A.I., Ivojlov A.Ju., Garov E.V. i dr. Vlijanie mikrobnoj flory na techenie hronicheskogo gnojnogo srednego otita. Med. sovet. 2014; 3: 21–3 [Kryukov A.I., Ivoylov A.Y., Garov E.V. et al. Effect of microbial flora on the course of chronic suppurative otitis media. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2014; 3: 21–3 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2014-3-21-23
- Garov E.V., Sidorina N.G., Zelenkova V.N. i dr. Analiz effektivnosti timpanoplastiki u bol'nyh hronicheskim perforativnym srednim otitom. Vestn otorinolaringol. 2014; 6: 8–11 [Garov E.V., Sidorina N.G., Zelenkova V.N. et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of tympanoplasty in the patients presenting with chronic otitis media complicated by perforation. Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology = Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2014; 6: 8–11 (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino201468-11
- Eldaebes M., Landry T., Bance M. Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforations: A temporal bone study of several tympanoplasty materials. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (9): 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222728
- Haynes D., Vos J., Labadie R. Acellular allograft dermal matrix for tympanoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13 (5): 283–6. DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000172820.97322.8d
- Mohamad S., Khan I., Hussain S. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otology & Neurotology. 2012; 33 (5): 699–705. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318254fbc2
- Horov O.G., Plavskij D.M. Timpanoplastika s primeneniem hrjaschevyh plastin pri obshirnyh defektah barabannoj pereponki. Novosti hirurgii. 2010; 1 (18): 108–13 [Khorov O.G., Plavskii D.M. Timpanoplastika s primeneniem khryashchevykh plastin pri obshirnykh defektakh barabannoi pereponki. Novosti khirurgii. 2010; 1 (18): 108–13 (in Russ.)].
- Fernandes V., Goel H., De Sousa E. et al. A Comparative Study of Type-I Underlay Tympanoplasty with Temporalis Fascia Graft Alone and with Conchal Cartilage. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 2 (71): 1320–6. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1397-1
- Vahidi M., Mollasadeghi A., Shahbazian H. et al. Does Malleolus non-Lifting Tympanoplasty have any Advantage Over Malleus Lifting Techniques? Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 28 (84): 7–11.