Capsular contracture as a complication of endoprosthesis of mammary glands after reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2020-11-08
Download full text PDF
Issue: 
11
Year: 
2020

D. Larionov(1); A. Zikiryakhodzhaev(2), MD; E. Rasskazova(2), Candidate of Medical Sciences
(1)M.V. Lomosonov Moscow State University (2)P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch,
National Medical Radiology Research Center

One of the most frequent complications after reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer with the use of a silicone endoprosthesis is the formation of a capsular contracture. Its occurrence is associated with the body’s response to a foreign body, which leads to the formation of fibrous tissue around the implant. Subsequently, this complication can lead to discomfort, pain syndrome and an unsatisfactory aesthetic result.
Keywords: 
oncology
surgery
capsular contracture
complications
breast cancer

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat или click here to download the PDF file.

References: 
  1. Adesiyun T.A., Lee B.T., Yueh J.H. et al. Impact of sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy and breast reconstruction on timing and rate of complications and patient satisfaction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80 (2): 392–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.039
  2. Kaprin A.D., Starinskij V.V., Petrova G.V. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovanija v Rossii v 2018 godu (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii, 2019; 250 s. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskii V.V., Petrova G.V. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2018 godu (zabolevaemost’ i smertnost’). M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii, 2019; 250 s. (in Russ.)].
  3. Alfano C. Clinical examination and follow-up mammary Peterson R. eds. St Louis: Mosby, 2002; 9 (8): 127–9.
  4. Anderson P.R., Hanlon A.L., Fowble B.L. et al. Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 8 (2): 110–34.
  5. Arnold M., Karim-Kos H.E., Coebergh J.W. et al. Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: Analysis of the European Cancer Observatory. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 10 (8): 56–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.002
  6. Hakelius L., Ohlsen L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a five year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1566–9. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199711000-00030
  7. Minami E., Koh I.H., Ferreira J.C. et al. The composition and behavior of capsules around smooth and textured breast implants in pigs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 1181 (4): 874–84. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240878.24213.b7
  8. Little G., Baker J.L.Jr. Results of closed compression capsulotomy for treatment of contracted breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980; 65: 30–3. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198001000-00006
  9. Gutowski K.A., Mesna G.T., Cunningham B.L. Saline-filled breast implants: a plastic surgery educational foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1019–27. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199709001-00028
  10. Namnoum J.D., Largent J., Kaplan H.M. et al. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013; 66: 1165–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046
  11. Stevenson T.R., Goldstein J.A. TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction or mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016; 26 (7): 123. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199308000-00005
  12. Hakelius L., Ohlsen L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: a five-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1566–9. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199711000-00030
  13. Schreml S., Heine N., Eisenmann-Klein M. et al. Bacterial colonization is of major relevance for high-grade capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59 (2): 126–30. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000252714.72161.4a
  14. Jacombs A., Tahir S., Hu H. et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the influence of implant surface on the formation of bacterial biofilm in mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133 (4): 471e–480e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000020
  15. Badihi Hauslich L., Sela M.N., Steinberg D. et al. The adhesion of oral bacteria to modified titanium surfaces: role of plasma proteins and electrostatic forces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (Suppl. A100): 49–56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02364.x
  16. Teughels W., Van Assche N., Sliepen I. et al. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17 (Suppl. 2): 68–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
  17. Stevens W.G., Nahabedian M.Y., Calobrace M.B. et al. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132 (5): 1115–23. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68
  18. Wong C.H., Samuel M., Tan B.K. et al. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118 (5): 1224–36. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237013.50283.d2
  19. Spear S.L., Murphy D.K., Allergan Silicone Breast Implant USCCSG. Natrelle round silicone breast implants: Core Study results at 10 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133 (6): 1354–61. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000021
  20. Pollock H. Breast capsular contracture: A retrospective study of textured versus smooth silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 123.
  21. Baker J.L.Jr. Augmentation mammaplasty: A comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103: 1763.
  22. Handel N., Jensen J.A., Black Q. et al. The fate of breast implants: A critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96: 1521. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199512000-00003
  23. Wong C.-H., Samuel M., Tan B.-K., et al. Capsular Contracture in Subglandular Breast Augmentation with Textured versus Smooth Breast Implants: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118 (5): 1224–36. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237013.50283.d2
  24. Minami E., Koh I.H., Ferreira J.C. et al. The composition and behavior of capsules around smooth and textured breast implants in pigs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 1181 (4): 874–84. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240878.24213.b7
  25. Abramo A.C., De Oliveira V.R., LedoSilva M.C. et al. How texture inducing contraction vectors affect the fibrous capsule shrinkage around breasts implants? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 555–60. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-010-9495-9
  26. (FDA) UFaDA. Breast implants. 2013. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/
  27. Barone F.E., Perry L., Keller T. et al. The biomechanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90 (1): 77–86. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199207000-00012
  28. Brand K.G. Foam-covered mammary implants. Clin Plastic Surg. 1988; 15 (4): 533–9.
  29. Asia A.-H. Q & A: polyurethane foam cohesive silicone gel breast implants. 2013 Available from: http://www.alpha-healthasia.com/article/q-polyurethane- foam-cohesive-silicone-gel-breast-implants
  30. Va’zquez G, Pello’n A. Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 31 (4): 330–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-006-0207-4
  31. Chen C.M., Cano S.J., Klassen A.F. et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J. 2010; 16 (6): 587–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010. 00983.x
  32. MHRA. Reintroduction of polyurethane-coated breast implants in the UK. 2005. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141205150130/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bi/documents/websiteresources/con2017980.pdf
  33. Van Zele D., Heymans O. Breast implants. A review. Acta Chir Belg. 2004; 104: 158–65. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679528
  34. National Toxicology Program. Bioassay of 2,4-diaminotoluene for possible carcinogenicity. Natl Cancer Inst Carcinog Tech Rep Ser. 1979; 162: 1–139.
  35. Pharma and MedTech Business Intellignece. The gray sheet: bristol-myers squibb polyurethane-coated breast implant study [Internet]. Informa Business Information Inc.; 1993 [cited 2015 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.pharmamed-techbi.com/publications/the-gray-sheet/19/040/bristol-myers-squibb-polyurethanecoated-breast-implant-study
  36. Hester T.R.Jr, Ford N.F., Gale P.J. et al. Measurement of 2,4-toluenediamine in urine and serum samples from women with Meme or Replicon breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 1291–8. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199710000-00035
  37. Yoon A.P., Qi J., Brown D.L. et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 36 (2): 177. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.009
  38. Spear S.L., Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 930–42. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00016
  39. Spear S.L., Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 930–42. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00016
  40. Cordeiro P.G., McCarthy C.M. A single surgeon’s 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 832–9. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232397. 14818.0e
  41. Percec I., Bucky L.P. Successful prosthetic breast reconstruction after radiation therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 527–31. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318172f5fc
  42. Salzberg C.A., Ashikari A.Y., Berry C. et al. Acellular Dermal Matrix Assisted Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 329–37. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002331
  43. Castello M.F., Lazzeri D., Silvestri A. et al. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011; 35: 828–38. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-011-9704-1
  44. Salgarello M., Visconti G., Farallo E. Autologous fat graft in radiated tissue prior to alloplastic reconstruction of the breast: report of two cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 5–10. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9367-3
  45. Sarfati I., Ihrai T., Kaufman G. et al. Adiposetissue grafting to the post-mastectomy irradiated chest wall: preparing the ground for implant reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 1161–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.031
  46. Roca G.B., Graf R., da Silva Freitas R. et al. Autologous fat grafting for treatment of breast implant capsular contracture: a study in pigs. Aesthet Surg J. 2014; 34: 769–75. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X14533184
  47. Bastos E.M., Sabino Neto M., Garcia E.B. et al. Effect of zafirlukast on capsular contracture around silicone implants in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2012; 27: 1–6. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502012000100001
  48. Spano A., Palmieri B., Taidelli T.P. et al. Reduction of capsular thickness around silicone breast implants by zafirlukast in rats. Eur Surg Res. 2008; 41: 8–14.
  49. Mazzocchi M., Dessy L.A., Alfano C. et al. Effects of zafirlukast on capsular contracture: long-term results. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012; 25: 935–44. DOI: 10.1177/039463201202500411
  50. Reid R.R., Greve S.D., Casas L.A. The effect of zafirlukast (Accolate) on early capsular contracture in the primary augmentation patient: a pilot study. Aesthet Surg J. 2005; 25: 26–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2004.12.003