Многоцентровая клиническая оценка эффективности гидроактивных раневых повязок
Номер журнала:
12
Год издания:
2019
Оценивается эффективность гидроактивных раневых повязок при осуществлении дебридмента и подготовке некротически измененного раневого ложа острых и хронических ран.
Ключевые слова:
раневые некрозы
HydroClean plus / ГидроКлин плюс
гидроактивная раневая повязка
струп
Для цитирования
Hodgson H., Davidson D., Duncan A., Guthrie J., Henderson E., . Macdiarmid M, McGown M, . Pollard V, Potter R., Rodgers A., Wilson A., Horner J., Doran M., Simm S., Taylor R., Rogers A., Rippon M., Colgrave M. Многоцентровая клиническая оценка эффективности гидроактивных раневых повязок
. Врач, 2019; (12): 75-81 Список литературы:
- Guest J., Ayoub N., McIlwraith T. et al. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK // BMJ Open 2015; 5 (12):e009283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283.
- Swanson T., Grothier L., Schultz G. Wound infection made easy. Wounds International. URL: https://tinyurl.com/m7t4mrg (accessed 18 October 2017).
- Ousey K., Rogers A., Rippon M. HydroClean plus: a new perspective to wound cleansing and debridement // Wounds UK. – 2016; 12 (1): 94–104.
- Robson M., Steed D., Franz M. Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories // Curr. Probl. Surg. – 2001; 38 (2): 72–140. https://doi.org/10.1067/msg.2001.111167.
- Schultz G., Sibbald R., Falanga V. et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management // Wound Repair Regen. – 2003; 11 (Suppl. 1): S1–S28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.11.s2.1.x.
- Falanga V., Saap L., Ozonoff A. Wound bed score and its correlation withhealing of chronic wounds // Dermatol. Ther. – 2006; 19 (6): 383–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00096.x.
- Barrett S. Wound-bed preparation: a vital step in the healing process // Br. J. Nurs. – 2017; 26 (12): S24–S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.12.S24.
- Steed D. Debridement // Am. J. Surg. – 2004; 187 (5A): S71–S74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00307-6.
- Panuncialman J., Falanga V. The science of wound bed preparation // Surg. Clin. North Am. – 2009; 89 (3): 611–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.009.
- Sibbald R., Woo K., Ayello E. Increased bacterial burden and infection:the story of NERDS and STONES // Adv. Skin Wound Care. – 2006; 19 (8): 447–61.
- Snyder R., Bohn G., Hanft J. et al. Wound biofilm: current perspectives and strategies on biofilm disruption and treatments // Wounds. – 2017; 29 (6, Suppl.): S1–S17.
- Anderson I. Debridement methods in wound care // Nurs. Stand. – 2006; 20 (24): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2006.02.20.24.65.c4077.
- Strohal R., Dissemond J., Jordan O’Brien J. et al. An updated overview andclarification of the principle role of debridement // J. Wound Care. – 2013; 22 (Suppl. 1): S1–S49. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2013.22.Sup1.S1.
- Nazarko L. Advances in wound debridement techniques // Br. J. Community Nurs. – 2015; Suppl Community Wound Care: S6–S8. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.Sup6.S6.
- Wilcox J., Carter M., Covington S. Frequency of debridements and timeto heal: a retrospective cohort study of 312744 wounds // JAMA Dermatol. – 2013; 149 (9): 1050–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960.
- Sibbald R., Williamson D., Orsted H. et al. Preparing the wound beddebridement,bacterial balance, and moisture balance // Ostomy Wound Manage. – 2000; 46 (11): 14–35.
- Gray D., Acton C., Chadwick P. et al. Consensus guidance for the use of debridement techniques in the UK // Wounds UK. – 2011; 7 (1): 77–84.
- Vowden K., Vowden P. Debridement made easy // Wounds UK. – 2011; 7 (4): 1–4.
- Atkin L., Rippon M. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue // Br. J. Nurs. – 2016; 25 (20): S40–S47. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.S40.
- Konig M., Vanscheidt W., Augustin M. et al. Enzymatic versus autolyticdebridement of chronic leg ulcers: a prospective randomised trial // J. Wound Care. – 2005; 14 (7): 320–3. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2005.14.7.26813.
- Humbert P., Faivre B., Veran Y. et al. Protease-modulating polyacrylate-basedhydrogel stimulates wound bed preparation in venous leg ulcers a randomizedcontrolled trial // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. – 2014; 28 (12): 1742–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12400.
- Spruce P., Bullough L., Johnson S. et al. Introducing HydroClean plus for wound-bed preparation: a case series // Wounds International. – 2016; 7 (1): 26–32.
- Grey J., Harding K., Enoch S. Pressure ulcers // BMJ. – 2006; 332 (7539): 472–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7539.472.
- Hansson C. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group // Int. J. Dermatol. – 1998; 37 (5): 390–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00415.x.
- Wild T., Eberlein T., Andriessen A. Wound cleansing efficacy of two cellulose-based dressings // Wounds UK. – 2010; 6 (3): 14–21.
- Gethin G., Cowman S., Kolbach D. Debridement of venous leg ulcers // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – 2015; 9: CD008599. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2.
- Skog E., Arnesjo B., Troeng T. et al. A randomised trial comparing cadexomer iodine and standard treatment in the out-patient management of chronic venous ulcers // Br. J. Dermatol. – 1983; 109 (1): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1983.tb03995.x
- Alvarez O., Philips T., Menzoian J. et al. An RCT to compare bio-cellulose wound dressing with a non-adherent dressing in VLUs // J. Wound Care. – 2012; 21 (9): 448–53. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2012.21.9.448.
- Frykberg R., Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds // Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). – 2015; 4 (9): 560–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0635.
- Hopkins A., Dealey C., Bale S. et al. Patient stories of living with a pressureulcer // J. Adv. Nurs. – 2006; 56 (4): 345–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04007.x.
- Spilsbury K., Nelson A., Cullum N. et al. Pressure ulcers and their treatmentand effects on quality of life: hospital inpatient perspectives // J. Adv. Nurs. – 2007; 57 (5): 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04140.x
- Stephen-Haynes J., Bielby A., Searle R. Putting patients first: reducing the human and economic costs of wounds // Wounds UK. – 2011; 7 (3): 47–55.
- Persoon A., Heinen M., van der Vleuten C. et al. Leg ulcers: a review of their impact on daily life // J. Clin. Nurs. – 2004; 13 (3): 341–54. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00859.x.
- Groenewald J. An evaluation of dextranomer as a cleansing agent in the treatment of the post-phlebitic stasis ulcer // S. Afr. Med. J. – 1980; 57 (20): 809–15.
- Ousey K., Rogers A., Rippon M. Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressings simplify T.I.M.E. wound management framework // Br. J. Community Nurs. – 2016a; 21 (Suppl. 12): S39–S49. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup12.S39.
- Falanga V. The chronic wound: impaired healing and solutions in the context of wound bed preparation // Blood Cells Mol. Dis. – 2004; 32 (1): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2003.09.020.
- Scotton M., Miot H., Abbade L. Factors that influence healing of chronic venous leg ulcers: a retrospective cohort // An. Bras. Dermatol. – 2014; 89 (3): 414–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142687.
- Brothers K., Stella N., Hunt K. et al. Putting on the brakes: bacterial impediment of wound healing // Sci. Rep. – 2015; 5: 14003. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14003.
- Leaper D., Schultz G., Carville K. et al. Extending the TIME concept: What have we learned in the past 10 years? // Int. Wound J. – 2012; 9 (1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01097.x.
- Ramundo J., Gray M. Enzymatic wound debridement // J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. – 2008; 35 (3): 273–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000319125.21854.78.
- Olin J., Beusterien K., Childs M. et al. Medical costs of treating venousstasis ulcers: evidence from a retrospective cohort study // Vasc. Med. – 1999; 4 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358836X9900400101.
- Kerstein M., Gemmen E., van Rijswijk L. et al. Cost and cost effectivenessof venous and pressure ulcer protocols of care // Dis. Manage Health Outcomes. – 2001; 9 (11): 651–63. https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109110-00005.
- Crowe S., Cresswell K., Robertson A. et al. The case study approach // BMC Med. Res. Methodol. – 2011; 11 (100). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-10