The portraits of patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac conduction disorders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2022-03-10
Issue: 
3
Year: 
2022

I. Bryukhanova; E. Gorbunova, MD; S. Mamchur, MD; Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy
of Sciences, Professor O. Barbarash, MD Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases,
Kemerovo

Objective: to comparatively analyze the clinical and historical data of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by heart block, in the absence of indications for continuous cardiac pacing and in the presence of indications for pacemaker implantation in the acute and delayed periods after the index event. Subjects and methods. The authors formed a cohort of patients with prior MI (2011–2015) complicated by cardiac conduction disorders. Group 1 included 72 patients in whom a pacemaker (PM) had not been implanted; Groups 2 (n=46) and 3 (n=68) consisted of MI patients who had indications for early and delayed pacemaker implantation, respectively. Results. Group 1 showed a preponderance of patients with inferior ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, single-vessel coronary artery disease, and successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Group 2 included patients with anterior non-STEMI complicated by Killip class II–IV who had multivessel coronary artery disease, mainly with third-degree AV block. In Group 3, there were equal proportions of STEMI and inferior non-STEMI complicated by second- degree AV block corrected by continuous cardiac pacing at 3.2±1.9 years after an acute coronary event. Conclusion. The found differences in the clinical and historical data of patients with MI complicated by heart block suggest that it is advisable to elaborate an algorithm that determines the management tactics for patients with impaired cardiac conduction in acute MI.
Keywords: 
cardiology
myocardial infarction
heart block
clinical and anamnestic characteristics of patients

References: 
  1. Ostryj koronarnyj sindrom bez pod'ema segmenta ST elektrokardiogrammy. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva zdravoohranenija Rossijskoj Federatsii. M., 2020; s. 152.
  2. Ostryj infarkt miokarda s pod'emom segmenta ST elektrokardiogrammy. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva Zdravoohranenija Rossijskoj Federatsii. M., 2020; s. 157.
  3. Mamaradzhapova D.A., Mamutov R.Sh., Urinov O. Dogospital'naja i gospital'naja vnezapnaja serdechnaja smert' ot ostrogo infarkta miokarda v zavisimosti ot faktorov riska. Vestnik ekstrennoj meditsiny. 2014; 1: 55–60.
  4. Badykov M.R., Plechev V.V., Sagitov I.Sh. i dr. Analiz oslozhnenij i osobennosti koronarnogo krovosnabzhenija u patsientov s sindrom slabosti sinusovogo uzla i implantirovannym elektrokardiostimuljatrom. Meditsinskij vestnik Bashkortostana. 2018; 13 (3): 11–6.
  5. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po primeneniju elektrokardiostimuljatorov, implantiruemyh kardioverterov-defibrilljatorov, ustrojstv dlja serdechnoj resinhronizirujuschej terapii i implantiruemyh kardiomonitorov. M. 2017; s. 702.
  6. Stewart R.A.H., Gao W., French J.K. et al. Or the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO-2) Trial Investigators. Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (1): 21–8. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi622
  7. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva Zdravoohranenija Rossijskoj Federatsii «Bradiaritmii i narushenija provodimosti». M., 2020; s. 113.
  8. Samii S.M. Indications for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99 (4): 795–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.02.008
  9. Fan X., Maharjan P., Liu P. et al. Effect of primary PCI on the recovery of atrioventricular block in inferior STEMI patients with late presentation (>12 hours): insights from a single center 10-year experience. J Investig Med. 2020; 68 (5): 1011–4. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2019-001255
  10. Malik J., Laique T., Farooq M.H. et al. Impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on complete atrioventricular block with acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Cureus. 2020; 12 (8): e10013. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10013
  11. Yadav S., Yadav H., Dwivedi S.K. et al. The time to reversal of complete atrioventricular block and its predictors in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020; 63: 129–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.10.008
  12. Chera H.H., Mitre C.A., Nealis J. et al. Frequency of complete atrioventricular block complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiology. 2018; 140 (3): 146–51. DOI: 10.1159/000491076
  13. Kosmidou I., Redfors B., McAndrew T. et al. Worsening atrioventricular conduction after hospital discharge in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Coron Artery Dis. 2017; 28 (7): 550–6. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000525
  14. Iskenderov B.G., Kazantsev A.V., Il'in O.A. i dr. Sroki i pokazanija k implantatsii kardiostimuljatora u bol'nyh ostrym infarktom miokarda, oslozhnennym atrioventrikuljarnoj blokadoj. Kardiologija. 2000; 8: 20–4.
  15. Iskenderov B.G., Maksimov D.B. Atrioventrikuljarnye blokady, oslozhnivshie techenie ostrogo infarkta miokarda: vybor optimal'nyh srokov i utochnenie pokazanij k implantatsii kardiostimuljatora. Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Meditsinskie nauki. 2011; 2 (18): 82–9.
  16. Ostryi koronarnyi sindrom bez pod»ema segmenta ST elektrokardiogrammy. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 2020; s. 152 (in Russ.).
  17. Ostryi infarkt miokarda s pod»emom segmenta ST elektrokardiogrammy. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva Zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 2020; s. 157 (in Russ.).
  18. Mamaradjapova D.A., Mamutov R.Sh., Urinov O. Pre-hospital and hospital sudden cardiac death from a acute myocardial infarction in depending on risk factors. Vestnik ekstrennoi meditsiny. 2014; 1: 55–60 (in Russ.).
  19. Badykov M.R., Plechev V.V., Sagitov I.S. et al. Analysis of complications and features of coronary blood supply in patients with sick sinus syndrome and implanted pacemaker. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2018; 13 (3): 11–6 (in Russ.).
  20. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po primeneniyu elektrokardiostimulyatorov, implantiruemykh kardioverterov-defibrillyatorov, ustroistv dlya serdechnoi resinkhroniziruyushchei terapii i implantiruemykh kardiomonitorov. M. 2017; s. 702 (in Russ.).
  21. Stewart R.A.H., Gao W., French J.K. et al. Or the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO-2) Trial Investigators. Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (1): 21–8. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi622
  22. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Ministerstva Zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii «Bradiaritmii i narusheniya provodimosti». M., 2020; s. 113 (in Russ.).
  23. Samii S.M. Indications for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99 (4): 795–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.02.008
  24. Fan X., Maharjan P., Liu P. et al. Effect of primary PCI on the recovery of atrioventricular block in inferior STEMI patients with late presentation (>12 hours): insights from a single center 10-year experience. J Investig Med. 2020; 68 (5): 1011–4. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2019-001255
  25. Malik J., Laique T., Farooq M.H. et al. Impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on complete atrioventricular block with acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Cureus. 2020; 12 (8): e10013. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10013
  26. Yadav S., Yadav H., Dwivedi S.K. et al. The time to reversal of complete atrioventricular block and its predictors in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020; 63: 129–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.10.008
  27. Chera H.H., Mitre C.A., Nealis J. et al. Frequency of complete atrioventricular block complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiology. 2018; 140 (3): 146–51. DOI: 10.1159/000491076
  28. Kosmidou I., Redfors B., McAndrew T. et al. Worsening atrioventricular conduction after hospital discharge in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Coron Artery Dis. 2017; 28 (7): 550–6. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000525
  29. Iskenderov B. G., Kazantsev A.V., Ilyin O. A. et al. Terms and indications for pacemaker implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrioventricular block. Cardiology. 2000; 8: 20–4 (in Russ.).
  30. Iskenderov B.G., Maksimov D.B. Atrioventrikulyarnye blokady, oslozhnivshie techenie ostrogo infarkta miokarda: vybor optimal’nykh srokov i utochnenie pokazanii k implantatsii kardiostimulyatora. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Meditsinskie nauki. 2011; 2 (18): 82–9 (in Russ).