The course and outcome of pregnancy in recurrent retrochorial hematoma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2019-09-03
Issue: 
9
Year: 
2019

A. Kuznetsov(1); A. Martirosova(2), I. Ignatko(1), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences ; A. Rodionova(1) 1-I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) 2-N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

The problem of miscarriage and preterm pregnancy does not lose its relevance. Symptoms of a threatened miscarriage develop in 25% of pregnant women, i.e. in almost every four pregnant women, while in 13.0–16.7%, they are accompanied by the formation of retrochorial hematomas (RCH) that, in turn, lead to disturbances in the normal processes of implantation, trophoblastic in-vasion, and the formation of a uteroplacental hemodynamic compartment. The aim of the investi-gation was to study the characteristics of the course of pregnancy and the outcomes of labor when detecting various RCH volumes at 6–26 weeks’ gestation. Recurrent RCH (retromembranous, in-termembranous, retroplacental) is a serious complication of pregnancy. Unlike the hematoma de-tected only in the early pregnancy stages (less than 10 weeks’ gestation), recurrent uteroplacental hemorrhages substantially disrupt placentation processes, causing a considerable increase in the risk of early preterm delivery [OR = 9.344; 95% CI 1.180-73.976], placental insufficiency [OR = 5.625; 95% CI 2.452-12.906], including decompensated, ante- and intrapartum losses [RR = 1.825; 95% CI 1.596–2.086].

Keywords: 
obstetrics and gynecology
miscarriage
retrochorial hematoma
preterm labor
reproductive losses
placental insufficiency



References: 
  1. Akusherstvo. Natsional'noe rukovodstvo. Pod red. G.M. Savel'evoj, G.T. Suhih, V.N. Serova, V.E. Radzinskogo. 2-eizd., pererab. i dop. / M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015; 1088 s. [Akusherstvo. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Pod red. G.M. Savel’evoi, G.T. Sukhikh, V.N. Serova, V.E. Radzinskogo. 2-eizd., pererab. i dop. / M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015; 1088 s. (in Russ.)].
  2. Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V., Fedjunina I.A. i dr. Pregravidarnaja podgotovka i vedenie beremennosti u zhenschin s antenatal'noj gibel'ju ploda v anamneze // Akusherstvo i ginekologija. – 2016; 4: 36–43 [Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V., Fedyunina I.A. et al. Pregravid preparation and pregnancy management in women with a history of antenatal fetal death // Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. – 2016; 4: 36–43 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2016.4.36-43.
  3. Radzinskij V.E., Ordijants I.M., Pobedinskaja O.S. i dr. Progesteron i reproduktivnye poteri // Akusherstvo i ginekologija. – 2017; 8: 109–14 [Radzinsky V.E., Ordiyants I.M., Pobedinskaya O.S. et al. Progesterone and reproductive losses // Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. – 2017; 8: 109–14 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2017.8.109-14.
  4. Berghella V. Obstetrics evidence based guidelines. 2017. 3rd ed. / CRC Press, 2017; 381 p.
  5. FIGO committee report. Best practice in maternal-fetal medicine. FIGO Working Group on Best Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 2014 // Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. – 2015; 128: 80–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.011.
  6. Regan L., Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. In Bischof P (ed): Implantation and Miscarriage // Bailliere’s Best Practice Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. – 2000; 14: 839–54.
  7. Rai R., Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage seminar // Lancet. – 2006; 368: 601–11. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0.
  8. Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V., Timohina E.V. i dr. Fiziologija i patologija ploda i platsenty / M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015; 176 c. [Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V., Timokhina E.V. et al. Fiziologiya i patologiya ploda i platsenty / M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015; 176 c. (in Russ.)].
  9. Pelinescu-Onciul D. Subchorionic hemorrhage treatment with dydro- gesterone // Gynecol. Endocrinol. – 2007; 1: 77–81. DOI: 10.1080/ 09513590701584741.
  10. Kuznetsova N.B. Profilaktika perinatal'nyh oslozhnenij u beremennyh s retrohorial'nymi gematomami s uchetom ih patogeneza. Dis. ... d-ra med. nauk, 2017; 292 s. [Kuznetsova N.B. Profilaktika perinatal’nykh oslozhnenii u beremennykh s retrokhorial’nymi gematomami s uchetom ikh patogeneza. Dis. ... d-ra med. nauk, 2017; 292 s. (in Russ.)].
  11. Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V. Rannie sroki beremennosti: oslozhnenija i prognozirovanie perinatal'nyh ishodov // Vopr. ginekol., akusher. i perinatol. – 2012; 11 (5): 5–12 [Strizhakov A.N., Ignatko I.V. Early terms of pregnancy: complications and prognosis of perinatal outcomes // Vopr. ginekol., akusher. i perinatol. – 2012; 11 (5): 5–12 (in Russ.)].
  12. Yamada T., Atsuki Y., Wakasaya A. Characteristics of patients with subchorionic hematomas in the second trimester // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. – 2011; 38 (1): 180–4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01665.x.
  13. Tuuli M., Norman S., Odibo A. Perinatal Outcomes in Women With Subchorionic Hematoma. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Obstet. Gynecol. – 2011; 117 (5): 1205–12. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821568de.