SIMULATION OF THE CASING POSITION DURING MINIPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

Download full text PDF
Issue: 
4
Year: 
2017

N. Gadzhiev (1); S. Brovkin (1); V. Grigoryev (1); N. Tagirov (2), Candidate of Medical Sciences; S. Popov (3), MD; V. Obidnyak (3); A. Pisarev (4); Professor S. Petrov (4), MD 1-A.M. Nikiforov All-Russian Center of Emergency Radiation Medicine, Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters 2-Holy Hosiomartyr Elizabeth City Hospital, Saint Petersburg 3-Saint Luke Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg 4-Saint Petersburg Multidisciplinary Center

The authors investigated the impact of simulating the intraoperative casing position by the Bernoulli techniques (to set up the casing in the horizontal position) on the duration of surgery and the stone-free state during minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Keywords: 
nephrology
surgery
Bernoulli technique
minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
nephrolithiasis



It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat или click here to download the PDF file.

References: 
  1. Tagirov N.S. Klinicheskaja otsenka gruppy patsientov s korallovidnym nefrolitiazom // Aktual'nye voprosy urologii i andrologii. – 2011; 214–6.
  2. Nagele U., Horstmann M., Sievert K.-D. et al. A Newly Designed Amplatz Sheath Decreases Intrapelvic Irrigation Pressure During Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolitholapaxy: An in-Vitro Pressure-Measurement and Microscopic Study // J. Endourol. – 2007; 21: 1113–6.
  3. Nicklas A., Schilling D., Bader M. et al. The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy // World J. Urol. – 2015; 33: 1847–53.
  4. Eastwell P. Bernoulli? Perhaps, but what about viscosity? // Sci. Educ. Rev. – 2007; 6: 1–13.
  5. Turk C., Petrik A., Sarica K. et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis // Eur. Assoc. Urol. – 2015; 69: 475–82.
  6. Mishra S., Jagtap J., Sabnis R. et al. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Curr. Opin. Urol. – 2013; 23: 147–51.
  7. Gadzhiev N., Brovkin S., Grigoryev V. et al. Sculpturing in Urology, or How to Make Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Easier // J. Endourol. – 2014; 29 (5): 512–7.
  8. Raman J., Bagrodia A., Gupta A. et al. Natural History of Residual Fragments Following Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy // J. Urol. – 2009; 181: 1163–8.
  9. Hammer Ø., Harper D., Ryan P. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis // Palaeontol. Electron. – 2001; 4: 9–18.
  10. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G. et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences // Behav. Res. Methods. – 2007; 39: 175–91.
  11. Kumar P., Bach C., Kachrilas S. et al. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): «in vogue» but in which position? // BJU Int. – 2012; 110: 1018–21.
  12. Ganpule A., Bhattu A., Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc // World J. Urol. – 2014; 33: 235–40.
  13. Mishra S., Sharma R., Garg C. et al. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone // BJU Int. – 2011; 108: 896–900.
  14. Wright A., Rukin N., Smith D. et al. Mini, ultra, micro - nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques // Ther. Adv Urol. – 2016; 8: 142–6.
  15. Sabnis R., Ganesamoni R., Sarpal R. Miniperc // Curr. Opin. Urol. – 2012; 22: 129–33.
  16. Lahme S., Bichler K., Strohmaier W. et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones // Eur. Urol. – 2001; 40: 619–24.
  17. Rassweiler J., Rassweiler M.-C., Klein J. New technology in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy // Curr. Opin. Urol. – 2016; 26: 95–106.
  18. Nagele U., Nicklas A. Vacuum cleaner effect, purging effect, active and passive wash out: a new terminology in hydrodynamic stone retrival is arising – Does it affect our endourologic routine? // World J. Urol. – 2016; 34: 143–4.
  19. Yamaguchi A., Skolarikos A., Buchholz N.-P. et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study // J. Endourol. – 2011; 25: 933–9.
  20. Knoll T., Wezel F., Michel M. et al. Do Patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study // J/ Endourol. – 2010; 24: 1075–9.
  21. Hu G., Guo Z., Liu H. et al. A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report // Scand. J. Urol. – 2015; 49: 174–80.
  22. El-Nahas A., El-Assmy A., Mansour O. et al. A Prospective Multivariate Analysis of Factors Predicting Stone Disintegration by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Value of High-Resolution Noncontrast Computed Tomography // Eur. Urol. – 2007; 51: 1688–94.
  23. Hein S., Miernik A., Wilhelm K. et al. Endoscopically Determined Stone Clearance Predicts Disease Recurrence Within 5 Years After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery // J. Endourol. – 2016; 30: 644–9.