3D TECHNOLOGIES FOR REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
Issue:
11
Year:
2016
The authors have evaluated the efficiency of using full-sized gypsum-based 3D models to plan revision hip arthroplasty for complex acetabular defect. The use of modern 3D printers and software makes these technologies more affordable.
Keywords:
3D models
complex acetabular defects
pelvic dissociation
preoperative planning
References:
- Moskalev V.P., Kornilov N.V., Shapiro K.I. i dr. Meditsinskie i sotsial'nye problemy endoprotezirovanija sustavov konechnostej / SPb: MORSAR AV, 2001; 159 s.
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E. et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2007; 89 (4): 780–5.
- Sheth N., Melnic C., Paprosky W. et al. Acetabular distraction analternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity // Bone Joint J. – 2014; 96 (11): 36–42.
- Brown N., Hellman M., Haughom B. et al. Acetabular distraction an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement // Bone Joint J. – 2014; 96 (11): 73–7.
- Villanueva M., Rios-Luna A., Pereiro De Lamo J. et al. (2008). A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity // HSS Journal: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. – 2008; 4 (2): 128–37.
- Berasi C., Berend K., Adams J. et al. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Research. – 2015; 473 (2): 528–35.
- Hogan C., Ries M. Treatment of massive acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity with a custom triflange component and ilio-sacral fixation based on preoperative CT templating. A report of 2 cases // J. Clin. Exp. Research Hip Pathol. Ther. – 2015; 25 (6): 585–8.
- Taunton M., Fehring T., Edwards P. et al. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Research. – 2012; 470 (2): 428–34.
- Paprosky W., Perona P. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation // J. Arthroplasty. – 1994; 9 (1): 33–44.
- Jeong M., Kim H.-J., Lim S.-J. et al. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study // Hip pelvis. – 2016; 28 (2): 98–103.
- Del Gaizo D., Kancherla V., Sporer S. et al. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm follow up // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2012; 470 (2): 395–401.
- Siegmeth A., Duncan C., Masri B. et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. – 2009; 467 (1): 199–205.
- Long W., Noiseux N., Mabry T. et al. Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties // Iowa Orthop. J. – 2015; 35: 10813.
- Whitehouse M., Masri B., Duncan C. et al. Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2015; 473 (2): 521–7.