EXPERIENCE IN USING KNEE JOINT ONCOLOGICAL PROSTHESES IN TRAUMATOLOGY FOR EXTENSIVE JUXTA-ARTICULAR BONE DEFECTS

Download full text PDF
Issue: 
1
Year: 
2015

Professor V. Murylev (1,2), MD; M. Kholodaev (2), Candidate of Medical Sciences; P. Elizarov (1,2), Candidate of Medical Sciences; Ya. Rukin (1,2), Candidate of Medical Sciences; G. Rubin (2); A. Muzychenkov (1,2) 1 -I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University 2 -Center of Endoprosthestic Replacement, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow

The paper deals with usual problems for traumatologists/orthopedists in replacing the knee joint with oncological prostheses in massive juxta-articular destructions concurrent with the clinical and X-ray pattern of Stage III gonarthrosis.
Keywords: 
juxta-articular destruction
oncological prosthetic replacement
gonarthrosis

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat или click here to download the PDF file.

References: 
  1. Aliev M.D., Nisechenko D.V., Orehov M.N. i dr. Opyt ispol'zovanija megaprtotezov v hirurgicheskom lechenii bol'nyh s opuholjami kostej. Mat. nauch.-prakt. konf. Travmatologov-ortopedov Rossii s mezhd. uchastiem «Aktual'nye problemy kostnoj patologii u detej i vzroslyh». M., 2008; 16–7.
  2. Balberkin A.V., Il'in A.A., Kolondaev A.F. i dr. Rezul'taty primene nija modul'nyh endoprotezov MATI-TsITO tazobedrennogo i kolennogo susta-va. Mat. nauch.-prakt. konf. travmatologov ortopedov Rossii s mezhd. uchastiem «Aktual'nye problemy kostnoj patologii u detej i vzroslyh». M., 2008; 26–8.
  3. Balberkin A.V., Shavyrin D.A. Klinicheskoe primenenie serkljazhnogo bandazha TsITO-MATI // Kurskij nauch.-prakt. vestn. «Chelovek i ego zdoro-v'e». – 2001; 4: 83–9.
  4. Baranetskij A.L. Asepticheskaja nestabil'nost' onkologicheskih endo protezov tazobedrennogo i kolennogo sustavov (kliniko-eksperimental'noe issledovanie). Dis. … kand. med. nauk. M., 2002; 125 s
  5. Murylev V.Ju., Holodaev M.Ju., Elizarov P.M. i dr. Endoprotezirovanie 5. kolennogo sustava pri ego massivnyh destruktsijah u ortopedicheskih bol'nyh // Vrach. – 2012; 2: 74–81.
  6. Shavyrin D.A. Diagnostika i hirurgicheskoe lechenie opuholej i opuho lepodobnyh zabolevanij kostej, obrazujuschih kolennyj sustav u vzroslyh. Dis. … d-ra med. nauk. M., 2014; 240 s.
  7. Brand M., Daley R., Ewald F. et al. Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency // Clin. Orthop. – 1989; 248: 71–9.
  8. Griffin A., Parsons J., Davis A. et al. Uncemented tumorendoprostheses at the knee: root causes of failure // Clin. Orthop. – 2005; 438: 71–9.
  9. Engh G. Bone defect classification. Revision total knee arthroplasty. In Engh G., Rorabeck C., eds. / Williams and Wilkins, 1997; r. 63–120.
  10. Heisel C., Kinkel S., Bernd L. et al. Megaprostheses for the treatment of 10. malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs // Int. Orthop. – 2006; 30 (6): 452–7.
  11. Ilyas I., Kurar A., Moreau P. et al. Modular megaprosthesis for distal femoral 11. tumors // Int. Orthop. – 2001; 25: 375–7.
  12. Kotz R. Tumor endoprosthesis in malignant bone tumors // Orthopade. – 12. 1993; 22: 160–6.
  13. Li W., Yang R., Tsauo J. Knee proprioception in patients with osteosarcoma 13. around the knee after modular endoprosthetic reconstruction // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. – 2005; 87 (4): 850–6.
  14. Mittermayer F., Krepler P., Dominkus M. et al. Long-term follow-up of 14. uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lowerextremity // Clin. Orthop. – 2001; 388: 167–77.
  15. Myers G., Abudu A., Carter S. et al. The long-term results of endoprosthetic 15. replacement of the proximal tibia for bone tumours // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. – 2007; 89 (12): 1632–7.
  16. Natarajan M., Sivaseelam A., Rajkumar G. et al. Custom megaprosthetic 16. replacement for proximal tibialtumours // Int. Orthop. – 2003; 27 (6): 334–7.
  17. Ritter M., Keating E., Faris P. Screw and cement fixation of large defects in 17. total knee arthroplasty: a sequel // J. Arthroplasty. – 1993; 8: 63–5.
  18. Schwartz A., Kabo J., Eilber F. et al. Cemented distal femoralendoprostheses 18. for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2010; 468 (8): 2198–210.
  19. Shin D., Choong P., Chao E. et al. Large tumor endoprostheses and 19. extracortical bone-bridging: 28 patients followed 10–20 years // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 2000; 71: 305–11.
  20. Skaliczki G., Antal I., Kiss J. et al. Functional outcome and life quality after 20. endoprosthetic reconstruction following malignant tumours around the knee // Int. Orthop. – 2005; 29 (3): 174–8.